Toyota Aygo 2012 vs Toyota Auris 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Auris is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 32 HP less power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Toyota Auris. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Auris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2012 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. Toyota Auris 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Auris 2010 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.42 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 83 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 138 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | 777 litres | |
| Toyota Aygo has 216 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`180 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |