Toyota Aygo 2012 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 7 HP less power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Skoda Citigo. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Aygo could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Aygo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2012 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.42 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Aygo is 15 cm shorter than the Skoda Citigo, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 112 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |