Toyota Aygo 2012 vs Hyundai i10 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 67 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 98 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Aygo engine produces 1 HP more power than Hyundai i10, but torque is 5 NM less than Hyundai i10. Thanks to more power Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i10 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2012 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.42 m | 3.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.55 m | |
| Toyota Aygo is 15 cm shorter than the Hyundai i10, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 225 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | 910 litres | |
|
Hyundai i10 has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 86 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i10. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i10 (by 128 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai i10, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`405 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i10 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Hyundai i10 has
| |