Toyota Aygo 2012 vs Honda Jazz 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 22 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 42 litres | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo 2012 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.42 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 49 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 289 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 614 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |