Toyota Aygo 2012 vs Citroen C1 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Toyota Aygo and Citroen C1 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 21 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.42 m | 3.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Aygo is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen C1, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | 751 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Citroen C1, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C1 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
| |