Toyota Aygo 2012 vs Chevrolet Spark 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
| Toyota Aygo and Chevrolet Spark have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Spark engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2012 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.42 m | 3.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
| Toyota Aygo is 23 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | 873 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Spark has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 31 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Spark. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Spark (by 91 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`190 | 1`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Chevrolet Spark has
| |