Toyota Aygo 2014 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 111 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 42 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki SX4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.46 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 39 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 947 litres | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 97 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`240 | 1`380 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Aygo scores higher in safety tests, but Suzuki Swift is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Aygo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |