Toyota Aygo 2014 vs Renault Twingo 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 91 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Aygo engine produces 1 HP less power than Renault Twingo, but torque is 4 NM more than Renault Twingo. Despite less power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Twingo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Dacia Sandero, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.46 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 14 cm shorter than the Renault Twingo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 219 litres | |
|
Renault Twingo has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 51 litres less trunk space than the Renault Twingo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 8.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 1.5 metres more than that of the Renault Twingo, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`240 | 1`360 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Renault Twingo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Toyota Aygo, so Renault Twingo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Renault Twingo has
| |