Toyota Aygo 2014 vs Opel Adam 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
| Toyota Aygo engine produces 1 HP less power than Opel Adam, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Opel Adam. Despite less power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Adam, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Adam. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 38 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Adam engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Chevrolet Aveo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Adam engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2014 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.46 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 24 cm shorter than the Opel Adam, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 663 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Opel Adam. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`240 kg | 1`455 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Adam scores higher in safety tests, butToyota Aygo is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Adam scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Opel Adam has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Adam, so Opel Adam quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Opel Adam has
| |