Toyota Aygo 2014 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, but torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Aygo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.46 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 34 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 67 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`240 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |