Toyota Aygo 2014 vs Hyundai i10 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i10 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 18 HP less power than Hyundai i10, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Hyundai i10. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Aygo consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10, which means that by driving the Toyota Aygo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Aygo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i10 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i20, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i10 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2014 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. Hyundai i10 2016 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Hyundai i10 2016 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.46 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 21 cm shorter than the Hyundai i10, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 252 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1046 litres | |
|
Hyundai i10 has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 84 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`240 | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i10 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Hyundai i10 has
| |