Toyota Aygo 2018 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 18 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 37 litres | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2018 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.47 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 38 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 947 litres | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 97 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |