Toyota Aygo 2018 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 18 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2018 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.47 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Aygo is 60 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 132 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`588 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Renault Clio has
| |