Toyota Aygo 2018 vs Citroen C3 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Citroen C3. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2018 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.47 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 53 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 922 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 132 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C3, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |