Toyota Aygo 2014 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Aygo engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, but torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Toyota Aygo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2014 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.46 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 34 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 67 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |