Toyota Aygo 2009 vs Suzuki Alto 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 14 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 4.6 | 4.4 - 5.2 | |
|
Toyota Aygo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Alto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.42 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Aygo is 9 cm shorter than the Suzuki Alto, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 129 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 774 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Aygo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Alto. The Suzuki Alto may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`190 | ~ 1`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
| |