Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 68 HP | 55 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 130 NM | 106 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 - 16.8 seconds | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 4.2 | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
|
Toyota Aygo petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Toyota Aygo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 49 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 131 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 279 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`188 | ~ 1`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |