Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Nissan Micra 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.2 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 55 - 68 HP | 65 - 88 HP | |
Torque: | 93 - 130 NM | 110 - 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 - 16.8 seconds | 11.9 - 17.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 4.2 | 4.5 - 6.8 | |
Toyota Aygo petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. On average, Toyota Aygo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.41 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 31 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 371 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
751 litres | 584 litres | |
Toyota Aygo has 232 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 167 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`188 | ~ 1`485 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |