Toyota Aygo 2005 vs Nissan Micra 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Aygo
2005 - 2009
Nissan Micra
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.41.2 - 1.5

Performance

Power: 55 - 68 HP65 - 88 HP
Torque: 93 - 130 NM110 - 185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.2 - 16.8 seconds11.9 - 17.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 4.24.5 - 6.8
Toyota Aygo petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. On average, Toyota Aygo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.41 m3.72 m
Width: 1.62 m1.66 m
Height: 1.46 m1.54 m
Toyota Aygo is smaller.
Toyota Aygo is 31 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 139 litres371 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
751 litres584 litres
Toyota Aygo has 232 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 167 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.4 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Toyota Aygo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`188~ 1`485
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 18001600
Pros and Cons: Toyota Aygo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Nissan Micra has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv