Toyota Aygo 2012 vs Kia Picanto 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 69 - 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 94 - 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 - 14.9 seconds | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 4.6 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Toyota Aygo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.42 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Toyota Aygo is 18 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 139 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | 605 litres | |
| Toyota Aygo has 61 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Aygo (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`185 | ~ 1`335 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Picanto scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Aygo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |