Toyota Aygo 2014 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Toyota Aygo is available only with front wheel drive, while Suzuki Swift can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 69 HP | 90 - 140 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 118 - 235 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 - 15.5 seconds | 9.1 - 12.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 4.2 | 4.3 - 6.1 | |
Toyota Aygo petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.46 m | 3.85 m | |
Width: | 1.62 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 40 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 266 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 947 litres | |
Suzuki Swift has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 98 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`240 | ~ 1`396 | |
Safety: | |||
Toyota Aygo scores higher in safety tests, but Suzuki Swift is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Aygo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 8000 | 14 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |