Toyota Aygo 2014 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 71 - 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 88 - 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 - 15.5 seconds | 11.7 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 4.2 | 4.1 - 4.2 | |
|
Toyota Aygo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.46 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Toyota Aygo is smaller. Toyota Aygo is 34 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Aygo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 168 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Toyota Aygo has 67 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Aygo is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Toyota Aygo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`240 | ~ 1`333 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Aygo has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |