Toyota Avensis 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Toyota Avensis engine produces 3 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Toyota Avensis reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Avensis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Avensis consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Toyota Avensis over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Avensis consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Avensis gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.68 m | |
| Toyota Avensis is 18 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Avensis is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 509 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Avensis has 47 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Toyota Avensis uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Avensis is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Toyota Avensis can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Avensis has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Avensis has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |