Toyota Avensis 2000 vs Opel Omega 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Toyota Avensis engine produces 15 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Toyota Avensis reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Avensis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Avensis consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Toyota Avensis over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Avensis consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Avensis) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Toyota Avensis 2000 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Avensis 2000 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Toyota Avensis is smaller. Toyota Avensis is 38 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Avensis is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Avensis is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Omega. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Opel Omega has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Avensis has serious deffects in 255 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Avensis has
|
Opel Omega has
| |