Toyota Avensis 1999 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
Toyota Avensis is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Avensis engine produces 20 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Toyota Avensis reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Avensis consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Avensis could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Avensis consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
960 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 610'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Octavia engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Volkswagen Bora, Seat Leon | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Octavia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Skoda Octavia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Toyota Avensis 1999 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Avensis 1999 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Avensis is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Avensis is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`315 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Toyota Avensis has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Octavia has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Avensis, so Toyota Avensis quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 5.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Avensis has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |