Toyota Avensis 1997 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 128 HP | 90 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 250 NM | 137 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12.2 seconds | 9.2 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.0 | 5.4 - 8.3 | |
|
Toyota Avensis petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Carisma. On average, Toyota Avensis equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Avensis is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Carisma, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Avensis is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Avensis is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means Toyota Avensis can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`331 | ~ 1`696 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Avensis has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |