Toyota Auris 2007 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Auris is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Auris engine produces 19 HP more power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volvo C30. Thanks to more power Toyota Auris reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo C30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Auris consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Auris could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Auris consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo C30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo C30 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Auris 2007 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Auris 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Toyota Auris is smaller, but higher. Toyota Auris is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Auris is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
761 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Auris has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Auris has 103 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The Volvo C30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Auris is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo C30. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Auris has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |