Toyota Auris 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Auris engine produces 25 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Toyota Auris reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Auris is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Auris consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Auris could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Auris consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Kia Ceed engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Auris is 2 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Auris is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1335 litres | 1300 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Auris has 14 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. The Kia Ceed may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Auris (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Auris is 0.1 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Auris has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |