Toyota Auris 2013 vs Kia Ceed 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 132 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Auris engine produces 72 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Toyota Auris reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Auris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Auris consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Toyota Auris over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Auris consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Auris engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Verso | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Auris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Auris is 4 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Auris is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 380 litres | |
| Toyota Auris has 20 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.34 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Auris is 0.06 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 5800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Auris has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |