Toyota Auris 2015 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Toyota Auris) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Mazda 3) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Auris engine produces 29 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Toyota Auris reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 3.5 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 11.80 $ | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol$/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 3 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 3 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Toyota Auris is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Auris is 14 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Auris is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1334 litres | |
| Toyota Auris has 4 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Auris has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |