Toyota Auris 2010 vs Mazda 3 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Auris
2010 - 2013
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 2.21.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 177 HP105 - 260 HP
Torque: 132 - 400 NM145 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 13.1 seconds6.1 - 13.1 seconds
In general, Mazda 3 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Auris. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.8 - 6.74.3 - 9.6
Toyota Auris petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Toyota Auris equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.48 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.51 m1.47 m
Toyota Auris is 23 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Auris is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 354 litres481 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1335 litres1360 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Toyota Auris has 127 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 25 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight: ~ 1`793 kg~ 1`864 kg
Net weight:~ 1`310 kg~ 1`321 kg
Load capacity:~ 483 kg~ 543 kg
Toyota Auris load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 38004800
Pros and Cons: Toyota Auris has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv