Toyota 4-Runner 1990 vs Jeep Cherokee 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 296 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 42 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 56 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota 4-Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 12.8 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 440 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.63 m | |
| Toyota 4-Runner is 25 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |