Toyota 4-Runner 1990 vs Jeep Wrangler 1987
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 189 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
| Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 22 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 51 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. Despite the higher power, Toyota 4-Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 13.4 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 440 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Wrangler engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 19 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is larger, but lower. Toyota 4-Runner is 61 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 1223 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage capacity. Toyota 4-Runner has 846 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 877 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 1.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |