Toyota 4-Runner 1990 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 22 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 9 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Toyota 4-Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 11.4 | |
| Toyota 4-Runner consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is smaller. Toyota 4-Runner is 21 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1200 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2100 litres | 2050 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | 3`300 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`750 kg | 1`875 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 680 kg | 1`425 kg | |
| Toyota 4-Runner load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Therefore, Mitsubishi Pajero is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |