Toyota 4-Runner 1990 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 22 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 26 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota 4-Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 10.3 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is smaller, but higher. Toyota 4-Runner is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | 1136 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 2254 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota 4-Runner has 64 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The Jeep Grand Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 154 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |