Toyota 4-Runner 1990 vs Jeep Cherokee 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 22 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 26 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota 4-Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 9.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 9.1 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.62 m | |
| Toyota 4-Runner is 25 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |