Toyota 4-Runner 1990 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 22 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 38 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 33 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Toyota 4-Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 11.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 10.1 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota 4-Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is smaller, but higher. Toyota 4-Runner is 4 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota 4-Runner has 825 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 1430 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |