Toyota 4-Runner 1990 vs Land Rover Discovery 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 22 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is a more dynamic driving. Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 23 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. Due to the lower power, Toyota 4-Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 8.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Defender | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.91 m | |
| Toyota 4-Runner is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 1970 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Toyota 4-Runner has 90 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Discovery. This could mean that the Toyota 4-Runner uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |