Toyota 4-Runner 1995 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 185 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 294 NM | 266 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
Toyota 4-Runner is more dynamic to drive. Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 35 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Thanks to more power Toyota 4-Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 13.9 | |
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 79 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
580 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
Toyota 4-Runner is 21 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1263 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2257 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`381 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5800 | 4200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |