Toyota 4-Runner 1995 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
| Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 11 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 25 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 11.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota 4-Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota 4-Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Toyota 4-Runner is 14 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1263 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2257 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |