Toyota 4-Runner 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 13 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 133 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 10.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 525 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Toyota 4-Runner is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1263 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2257 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`381 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |