Toyota 4-Runner 1996 vs Suzuki Vitara 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 55 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 108 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 8.4 | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 840 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Baleno | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is larger. Toyota 4-Runner is 82 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 16 cm wider, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1263 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2257 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage capacity. Toyota 4-Runner has 683 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`381 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |