Toyota 4-Runner 2003 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 382 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is more dynamic to drive. Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 5 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 53 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Toyota 4-Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 13.5 | |
|
The Toyota 4-Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota 4-Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is smaller. Toyota 4-Runner is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1195 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1195 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2050 litres | 1790 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 260 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`322 kg | 3`300 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`825 kg | 2`215 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 497 kg | 1`085 kg | |
| Toyota 4-Runner load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Therefore, Mitsubishi Pajero is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |