Toyota 4-Runner 1995 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 373 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Toyota 4-Runner engine produces 15 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 133 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Toyota 4-Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 9.5 | |
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota 4-Runner could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
620 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.54 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.86 m | |
Toyota 4-Runner is smaller. Toyota 4-Runner is 26 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 17 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1263 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2257 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`381 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 5800 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |