Toyota 4-Runner 1991 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 17.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is more dynamic to drive. Toyota 4-Runner and Mitsubishi Pajero have the same engine power, but Toyota 4-Runner torque is 3 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Toyota 4-Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 12.4 | |
|
The Toyota 4-Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota 4-Runner consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota 4-Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner is smaller. Toyota 4-Runner is 21 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota 4-Runner has 120 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |