Toyota 4-Runner 1989 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.4 - 3.0 | 2.4 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 143 HP | 99 - 245 HP | |
Torque: | 192 - 295 NM | 211 - 343 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 - 22 seconds | 10 - 25.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 - 14.7 | 11.0 - 14.5 | |
Toyota 4-Runner petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, a Toyota 4-Runner with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
Toyota 4-Runner is smaller. Toyota 4-Runner is 22 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | 1350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 2600 litres | |
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Toyota 4-Runner has 150 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 500 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`490 | ~ 3`073 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |