Toyota 4-Runner 1989 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota 4-Runner
1989 - 1995
Suzuki Grand Vitara
1997 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.4 - 3.01.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 143 HP87 - 158 HP
Torque: 192 - 295 NM144 - 270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.3 - 22 seconds10.9 - 19.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.5 - 14.76.6 - 11.0
Toyota 4-Runner petrol engines consumes on average 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. On average, Toyota 4-Runner equipped with diesel engines consume 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.19 m
Width: 1.69 m1.77 m
Height: 1.75 m1.74 m
Toyota 4-Runner is 30 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1200 litres258 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2100 litres1080 litres
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage capacity.
Toyota 4-Runner has 942 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 1020 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`490~ 1`863
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 18002200
Pros and Cons: Toyota 4-Runner has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv