Toyota 4-Runner 1989 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota 4-Runner is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Isuzu Rodeo can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Isuzu Rodeo also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.6 - 3.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 143 HP | 120 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 295 NM | 204 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 - 22 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 - 14.7 | 12.0 - 13.2 | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Isuzu Rodeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
| Toyota 4-Runner is 1 cm longer than the Isuzu Rodeo, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`490 | ~ 2`148 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Isuzu Rodeo has
| |