Toyota 4-Runner 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota 4-Runner
2003 - 2005
Jeep Grand Cherokee
1998 - 2005
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Toyota 4-Runner is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jeep Grand Cherokee has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Engines: 4.0 - 4.7 (petrol)2.7 - 4.7 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Jeep Grand Cherokee is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 235 - 245 HP140 - 258 HP
Torque: 382 - 434 NM295 - 425 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 8 seconds8.3 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.2 - 14.19.7 - 16.5
Toyota 4-Runner petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 226 - 231 mm (8.9 - 9.1 inches)210 - 211 mm (8.3 - 8.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota 4-Runner can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.61 m
Width: 1.88 m1.85 m
Height: 1.76 m1.79 m
Toyota 4-Runner is larger, but slightly lower.
Toyota 4-Runner is 19 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 1195 litres1104 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2050 litres2047 litres
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage capacity.
Toyota 4-Runner has 91 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 3 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`411~ 2`447
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data3400
Pros and Cons: Toyota 4-Runner has
  • automatic transmission only
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • both manual and automatic
  • petrol and diesel engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv