Toyota 4-Runner 2003 vs Toyota Tundra 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota 4-Runner
2003 - 2005
Toyota Tundra
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Engines: 4.0 - 4.74.0 - 5.7

Performance

Power: 235 - 245 HP236 - 386 HP
Torque: 382 - 434 NM361 - 544 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 8 seconds6.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.2 - 14.113.1 - 15.3
Toyota 4-Runner petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Tundra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 226 - 231 mm (8.9 - 9.1 inches)259 - 264 mm (10.2 - 10.4 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m5.81 m
Width: 1.88 m2.03 m
Height: 1.76 m1.94 m
Toyota 4-Runner is smaller.
Toyota 4-Runner is 101 cm shorter than the Toyota Tundra, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 18 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 1195 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2050 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters13.6 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 2.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Tundra, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`411~ 3`085
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data21 400
Pros and Cons: Toyota 4-Runner has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Toyota Tundra has
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv