Toyota 4-Runner 2003 vs Toyota Tundra 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 4.0 - 4.7 | 4.0 - 5.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 235 - 245 HP | 236 - 386 HP | |
Torque: | 382 - 434 NM | 361 - 544 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 8 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 - 14.1 | 13.1 - 15.3 | |
Toyota 4-Runner petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Tundra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 226 - 231 mm (8.9 - 9.1 inches) | 259 - 264 mm (10.2 - 10.4 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 5.81 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 2.03 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.94 m | |
Toyota 4-Runner is smaller. Toyota 4-Runner is 101 cm shorter than the Toyota Tundra, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota 4-Runner is 18 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1195 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 13.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota 4-Runner is 2.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Tundra, which means Toyota 4-Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`411 | ~ 3`085 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 21 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota 4-Runner has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |