Tesla Model Y 2020 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2021
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | Electric | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Tesla Model Y engine produces 54 HP more power than Skoda Kodiaq, but torque is 10 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | ||
| Range per fill-up: | 393 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Kodiaq gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Kodiaq) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Tesla Model Y) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Tesla Model Y is larger, but lower. Tesla Model Y is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq, 4 cm wider, while the height of Tesla Model Y is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 854 litres | 835 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1926 litres | 2065 litres | |
| Tesla Model Y has 19 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 139 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Tesla Model Y is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`405 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`778 kg | 1`633 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 627 kg | 717 kg | |
| Tesla Model Y load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Skoda Kodiaq. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 37 200 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Tesla Model Y has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |